Machine Learning and Human History in a library

The Perspective of Academic Historians on Projects Attempting to Use AI to Create The Digital Footprint of Human History

Academic Insights about AI and Digital Footprint of Human History

One of the questions that academic historians address to projects attempting to use the power of AI to create The Digital Footprint of Human History is the issue of bias.

Here's how Emily Chung (PhD student, History) formulated this question in a discussion about the historica.org project with the Cambridge academic historian community, which took place on November 30th, 2023:

“Many of us are familiar with the phrase 'history is written by the victors,' and maps have often been used as a tool for asserting control by hegemonic powers. Given this, how do you compensate for bias in the sources you are drawing from? How do you fill in the gaps without succumbing to these biases? Or if you do succumb to them, how do you acknowledge this as a problem to the public?”

This is an important issue, as the solution to it affects the trust users, especially those from the academic community, place in the results. But does this problem have a solution? Can AI create a description of human history that is absolutely perfect in the eyes of all historians?

As another discussion participant, Dr. Alexis Litvine (a Researcher at The Cambridge Group for the History of Population and Social Structure (CAMPOP)), noted, if you want to create an unbiased consecutive history, keep in mind that this contradicts the mentality of academic historians. So, if you tell them I'm going to create something where there will be no argument about, first, they will not believe that it exists, and second, they will be very afraid of the concept of that.

He further explains the intrinsic nature of historical study as a field ripe with debate and disagreement.

"As a historian, if you want to make sure that a group of historians hard stance, you tell them that you want to produce unbiased consecutive history, our discipline and the mentality what we want is disputation around an argument where two people will disagree, and knowledge will be created by this"​​.

This insight underscores that the essence of historical inquiry is not in finding a singular truth but in exploring the multitude of perspectives and interpretations that arise from scholarly debate.

AI's Role in Historical Narratives

One approach that could be a solution is to abandon attempts to create a universally correct picture of the world. AI, with its main strength being the ability to process vast amounts of information, can become a tool for creating alternative histories. That is, AI allows us to view history through the eyes of different people, to consider the interpretation of the same events from different perspectives.

This approach aligns with the very nature of history as a multifaceted and subjective discipline. By leveraging AI, we can construct the intricacy of human history that acknowledges and includes diverse narratives. This method not only addresses the issue of bias but also celebrates the diversity of historical perspectives.

Moreover, it can open doors for a new way in understanding the past, where minority voices and lesser-known narratives find their place alongside the dominant stories. This multifaceted approach could revolutionise how we engage with history, making it a more inclusive and representative discipline.

Another approach could involve using AI to create maps and other layers of information that describe human history by analysing all available information about a specific period. This means utilising a broader dataset than just the perspectives of an Austro-Hungarian or British cartographer. An AI-based approach, grounded in a wider dataset, may offer a narrative that differs from these individual viewpoints. It doesn't claim objective truth but provides a platform for discussion.

In conclusion, the journey towards an unbiased 'Digital Footprint of Human History' is not about achieving a singular, definitive history, but about exploring the vast array of human experiences and perspectives. AI, in this respect, becomes not just a tool for data processing, but a means to facilitate a more inclusive and dynamic dialogue about our past. By embracing the diversity inherent in historical study and leveraging AI to present multiple viewpoints, we can enrich our understanding of history, making it a more comprehensive and representative field. This approach, embracing both the strengths of AI and the critical eye of the historian, could very well redefine our engagement with the past, transforming how we perceive, interpret, and learn from history.

Contribute to Historica's blog!

Learn guidelines, requirements, and join our history-loving community.

Become an author
Don't miss out on the latest news!
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

People also read

Man is writing about history and AI

Evaluating history, or solving it? Thoughts on the epistemology of historical “discoveries”

This article starts from a recent paper on the application of large language models to mathematical problems, to ask how far “evaluating” and “solving” are conceptually useful in understanding the past. It explores whether the idea of knowledge as “discovery” can be applied to history, and, if so, what that would mean for the parameters invoked by, and applied to, machine learning.
angus russell
Angus Russell
February 1, 2024
7
min read
Generative AI
History
Historical Research
Historical Processes
Mathematical Models
Researches discuss art history and ai axioms

Art, History, AI, and Axioms

Discover the impact of AI on art and history through insightful axioms. Explore ethical considerations, AI's role in historical research, and the balance between human and AI capabilities.
Anastasia Serbinova
Anastasia Serbinova
January 22, 2024
8
min read
History
Historical Processes
Ethics
Historical Research
The team is working on ontology using AI

Is it possible to create an ontology that could serve as the basis for describing the history of humanity using AI?

Developing an ontology for AI in human history, crucial for a digital footprint, involves interdisciplinary challenges: diverse data, multiple interpretations, expanding datasets, language barriers, standardization issues, and ethical considerations.
Anastasia Serbinova
Anastasia Serbinova
December 23, 2023
5
min read
Generative AI
History
Digital Humanities
Ontological Bridges

FAQs

How can I contribute to or collaborate with the Historica project?
If you're interested in contributing to or collaborating with Historica, you can use the contact form on the Historica website to express your interest and detail how you would like to be involved. The Historica team will then be able to guide you through the process.
What role does Historica play in the promotion of culture?
Historica acts as a platform for promoting cultural objects and events by local communities. It presents these in great detail, from previously inaccessible perspectives, and in fresh contexts.
How does Historica support educational endeavors?
Historica serves as a powerful tool for research and education. It can be used in school curricula, scientific projects, educational software development, and the organization of educational events.
What benefits does Historica offer to local cultural entities and events?
Historica provides a global platform for local communities and cultural events to display their cultural artifacts and historical events. It offers detailed presentations from unique perspectives and in fresh contexts.
Can you give a brief overview of Historica?
Historica is an initiative that uses artificial intelligence to build a digital map of human history. It combines different data types to portray the progression of civilization from its inception to the present day.
What is the meaning of Historica's principles?
The principles of Historica represent its methodological, organizational, and technological foundations: Methodological principle of interdisciplinarity: This principle involves integrating knowledge from various fields to provide a comprehensive and scientifically grounded view of history. Organizational principle of decentralization: This principle encourages open collaboration from a global community, allowing everyone to contribute to the digital depiction of human history. Technological principle of reliance on AI: This principle focuses on extensively using AI to handle large data sets, reconcile different scientific domains, and continuously enrich the historical model.
Who are the intended users of Historica?
Historica is beneficial to a diverse range of users. In academia, it's valuable for educators, students, and policymakers. Culturally, it aids workers in museums, heritage conservation, tourism, and cultural event organization. For recreational purposes, it serves gamers, history enthusiasts, authors, and participants in historical reenactments.
How does Historica use artificial intelligence?
Historica uses AI to process and manage vast amounts of data from various scientific fields. This technology allows for the constant addition of new facts to the historical model and aids in resolving disagreements and contradictions in interpretation across different scientific fields.
Can anyone participate in the Historica project?
Yes, Historica encourages wide-ranging collaboration. Scholars, researchers, AI specialists, bloggers and all history enthusiasts are all welcome to contribute to the project.