Blog

How do maps created fixed points, and what do those points reveal about history? This article explores how the information provided by maps can be rendered flexible and responsive throughAI-generated models, and so open up new avenues of historical research. 

McKinsey addresses algorithmic bias in AI neatly and structurally but overlooks inherent philosophical paradoxes and complexity dynamics. A multidisciplinary, agile model that incorporates ethical pluralism and continuous adaptation better suits today's AI landscape. Revisiting older frameworks is essential due to shifting societal norms and emerging regulations.

The intriguing confluence of machine learning and history, where trust plays a central role. With its historical significance in both medieval and modern contexts influences our understanding of the past. The article discovers the challenges and far-reaching implications of trusting machine learning as effective arbiters of history.

What is the transformative potential of generative AI like ChatGPT in historical research? Beyond its writing abilities, generative AI can analyze data, summarize text, and create visual aids like graphs and charts. This technology promises to revolutionize historical research, simplifying data processing and opening new avenues for exploration in the digital era of history.

Discover the mathematical underpinnings behind AI hallucinations and the significance of latent spaces. Despite the ability to handle vast datasets efficiently, generative models sometimes produce "hallucinations," creative but inaccurate outputs.

Artzrouni and Komlos's 1996 spatial model visually represents territorial dynamics in Europe from 500 to 1800 AD using a grid system. The model underscores the influence of a state's border position and suggests coastal countries form more predictably than inland ones. However, it highlights the limitations of solely using geopolitical mechanisms to predict empire dynamics. Turchin believes other factors, like Ibn Khaldun's concept of "asabiyyah" (collective solidarity), play a significant role in empire rise and fall.

Peter Turchin utilizes the Lotka-Volterra (predator-prey) equation, originally designed to model population dynamics between predators and their prey, to understand the complexities of medieval agrarian states. These states, according to Turchin, can be viewed as oscillating systems influenced by variables like territory size and military success. Drawing from Randall Collins' geopolitical theory, Turchin identifies key parameters such as geopolitical resources, logistic loads, and peripheral position. The interplay of these variables results in non-linear relationships between territory size and rate of change, suggesting there's an equilibrium point beyond which territorial expansion becomes inefficient for the state.

The University of Barcelona's team is exploring how combining AI, digital technology, and archaeological methods can provide a deeper understanding of history. Their research introduces concepts like Units of Topography and Actor to enrich archaeological standards. This approach aims to make history more accessible and better understood through modern technology while valuing human interpretation.

Introduced by Peter Turchin in 2003, cliodynamics uses mathematical models to analyze long-term historical trends. Drawing from the concept of “asabiyyah” (social solidarity), Turchin focused on medieval agrarian societies, using differential equations and multi-agent modeling. He identified various growth patterns in state dynamics and emphasized the need for negative feedback in models, highlighting the cyclical nature of historical growth and decline.

In an era fuelled by the might of big data, the question arises: can the blossoming field of event prediction enrich the realm of historical research? Delving into this interdisciplinary area, while recognizing its inherent complexities and potential setbacks, could be a stride towards constructing a higher quality historical timeline.