The team is working on ontology using AI

Is it possible to create an ontology that could serve as the basis for describing the history of humanity using AI?

Building an Ontology as the Foundation for AI-Driven Insights into Human History

Ontologies are structured representations of knowledge in a specific domain. They define concepts, relationships, and properties in a way that facilitates logical reasoning and inference, thereby enhancing AI's ability to work with data.

For using AI in the ambitious task of creating the digital footprint of human history, developing an ontology is a mandatory step. This is a multidisciplinary task requiring collaboration between historians, linguists, and AI specialists. And the task, of course, is not simple.

Challenges in Creating an Ontology for AI to Analyze Historical Data

Here are some challenges that arise in attempting to create an ontology for AI to work with historical data:

1. Complexity and diversity of historical data.

Creating ontologies in areas where data is structured, standardized, and has low interpretive ambiguity is labor-intensive but solvable.

Historical data varies in its diversity and multi-level nature, including texts, artifacts, historical records, and more. Creating an ontology capable of covering all this complexity is a non-trivial task.

Here is the quote Dr. Alexis Litvine (a Researcher at The Cambridge Group for the History of Population and Social Structure (CAMPOP), who emphasized a major problem in creating an ontology that would be agreeable to historical scientists:

“I work sometimes with ontologies for very specific mapping exercises, where in that case I'm mapping historical objects and already giving a group of French historians or specialists in that particular subject to agree on one ontology has proven an absolute nightmare. And I'm talking about there are probably 20 people in the world or in France who still do that. There are like four ontologies that disagree. How are you going to make people agree with your ontology?”

2. Historical data often allows for multiple interpretations.

Ontologies must be designed to account for these multiple perspectives and interpretations. Is this even possible in principle? Won't it eventually require such a degree of simplification that it becomes unacceptable for historical science?

3. Constant expansion of the array of data available for inclusion in the dataset.

A problem in creating a unified ontology for historical science is the processing and integration of a diverse array of historical data, especially in light of potential breakthroughs in handwriting recognition.

Dr. Leonardo Impett, University Assistant Professor in Digital Humanities, in a discussion on the task of creating the digital footprint of human history, articulated this problem:

“One thing that might influence that is if handwritten text recognition suddenly becomes extremely good and multilingual and can deal with paleographic problems, etc. And then suddenly you have the Florence State Archive all digitized, all becomes accessible. And that's then much more difficult to sort of ontologize than, say, Wikidata. So it starts to raise questions about the stack and how you put the stack together and how the ontology relies on assumptions about what kind of data you need and how the data will be accessed.”

4. Language and cultural barriers.

Historical data is often presented in different languages and reflects various cultural contexts. Is it possible to create an ontology that can adequately work with such data and understand its specifics?

5. Standardization challenges.

There is complexity in creating standards for ontologies, especially in such a diverse and multidisciplinary field as history. It is necessary to reach a consensus on what terms and concepts should be used.

6. Ethical and moral questions.

When working with historical data, it is important to consider ethical aspects, such as minority representation and respect for historical subjects. This requires a careful and thoughtful approach when creating an ontology.

7. Preserving context and nuances.

Historical data often contains subtle nuances and context that may be lost in the attempt to formalize data for AI.

Overcoming Challenges in Ontology Creation for AI-Enhanced Historical Research

These problems can be overcome. The key to solving them lies in the belief of the main stakeholders, especially historians, in the potential of AI to create a comprehensive narrative of human history. If historians, linguists, and AI specialists can come together to reach an agreement and develop a structured representation of historical knowledge, these obstacles can be overcome.

The successful creation of an ontology for historical sciences, capable of enhancing the abilities of AI in processing and analyzing historical data, depends on the combined efforts and collective faith in the transformative power of AI in historical research.

Contribute to Historica's blog!

Learn guidelines, requirements, and join our history-loving community.

Become an author
Don't miss out on the latest news!
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

People also read

Man is writing about history and AI

Evaluating history, or solving it? Thoughts on the epistemology of historical “discoveries”

This article starts from a recent paper on the application of large language models to mathematical problems, to ask how far “evaluating” and “solving” are conceptually useful in understanding the past. It explores whether the idea of knowledge as “discovery” can be applied to history, and, if so, what that would mean for the parameters invoked by, and applied to, machine learning.
angus russell
Angus Russell
February 1, 2024
7
min read
Generative AI
History
Historical Research
Historical Processes
Mathematical Models
Researches discuss art history and ai axioms

Art, History, AI, and Axioms

Discover the impact of AI on art and history through insightful axioms. Explore ethical considerations, AI's role in historical research, and the balance between human and AI capabilities.
Anastasia Serbinova
Anastasia Serbinova
January 22, 2024
8
min read
History
Historical Processes
Ethics
Historical Research
Machine Learning and Human History in a library

The Perspective of Academic Historians on Projects Attempting to Use AI to Create The Digital Footprint of Human History

In the quest for an unbiased Digital Footprint of Human History, the emphasis is not on achieving a singular, definitive history but on embracing the multitude of human experiences and perspectives. AI, when harnessed to present multiple viewpoints, becomes a catalyst for a more inclusive and dynamic dialogue about the past.
Anastasia Serbinova
Anastasia Serbinova
December 11, 2023
5
min read
Historical Research
Digital Humanities
History
Generative AI

FAQs

How can I contribute to or collaborate with the Historica project?
If you're interested in contributing to or collaborating with Historica, you can use the contact form on the Historica website to express your interest and detail how you would like to be involved. The Historica team will then be able to guide you through the process.
What role does Historica play in the promotion of culture?
Historica acts as a platform for promoting cultural objects and events by local communities. It presents these in great detail, from previously inaccessible perspectives, and in fresh contexts.
How does Historica support educational endeavors?
Historica serves as a powerful tool for research and education. It can be used in school curricula, scientific projects, educational software development, and the organization of educational events.
What benefits does Historica offer to local cultural entities and events?
Historica provides a global platform for local communities and cultural events to display their cultural artifacts and historical events. It offers detailed presentations from unique perspectives and in fresh contexts.
Can you give a brief overview of Historica?
Historica is an initiative that uses artificial intelligence to build a digital map of human history. It combines different data types to portray the progression of civilization from its inception to the present day.
What is the meaning of Historica's principles?
The principles of Historica represent its methodological, organizational, and technological foundations: Methodological principle of interdisciplinarity: This principle involves integrating knowledge from various fields to provide a comprehensive and scientifically grounded view of history. Organizational principle of decentralization: This principle encourages open collaboration from a global community, allowing everyone to contribute to the digital depiction of human history. Technological principle of reliance on AI: This principle focuses on extensively using AI to handle large data sets, reconcile different scientific domains, and continuously enrich the historical model.
Who are the intended users of Historica?
Historica is beneficial to a diverse range of users. In academia, it's valuable for educators, students, and policymakers. Culturally, it aids workers in museums, heritage conservation, tourism, and cultural event organization. For recreational purposes, it serves gamers, history enthusiasts, authors, and participants in historical reenactments.
How does Historica use artificial intelligence?
Historica uses AI to process and manage vast amounts of data from various scientific fields. This technology allows for the constant addition of new facts to the historical model and aids in resolving disagreements and contradictions in interpretation across different scientific fields.
Can anyone participate in the Historica project?
Yes, Historica encourages wide-ranging collaboration. Scholars, researchers, AI specialists, bloggers and all history enthusiasts are all welcome to contribute to the project.