ai bias in historical research

The Impact of Eurocentric Bias in AI-Driven Historical Research

The recent AI boom has led us to see Artificial Intelligence as the solution and guide for advancements and discoveries in a variety of domains, including history and archaeology. With innovations like 'Ithaca'; the first Deep Neural Network for the textual restoration of ancient Greek inscriptions with up to 71% accuracy, observing such groundbreaking restorations of ancient texts and artefacts is invaluable and has the potential to help us uncover lost knowledge and preserve it for future generations.

The issue lies in the reality that AI models are being trained mainly using eurocentric and western data sets, which are the most readily available. This raises concerns about whether the knowledge that we discover and will pass on is at all reliable and what this could mean in an era of technological advancements involving data.

What is Eurocentric Bias?

'Eurocentric bias' is the exploration of a situation through the narrative of European descendants, in the context of archaeology and history, this idea broadens to “a specific European understanding of the world” which is more systematically curated.

Throughout global history, we have observed the shortcomings of colonial frameworks which dominate in various fields such as Egyptology and Orientalism. These frameworks, which were primarily recorded through a eurocentric lens, led to distortions in significant events, through which predominantly British and French scholars enhanced stereotypes or downplayed the contributions of non-Western countries. The studies containing these inaccuracies then transferring into digital mediums, constitute the possibility of concerning results.

Coloniality of AI in Archaeology

Mohamed in "Decolonising Artificial Intelligence," emphasises the importance of a decolonial approach to AI in archaeology by integrating data from a broader range of cultures, resulting in more accurate and inclusive historical representations, something that is certainly necessary, given that Western archives account for more than 80% of available digital data.

Artificial intelligence in archaeological study frequently prioritises Western historical data while overlooking non-Western cultures, which is a reflection of the colonial legacy of Eurocentrism. By relying on European data, AI systems used in archaeology pose the risk of marginalising non-European histories and reinforcing colonial power patterns. In addition, colonial metropole-periphery dynamics are apparent in the predominance of Western tech corporations in AI development, producing biassed tools that favour European archaeological studies.

Challenges of Applying AI to Non-Western Archaeological Contexts

According to UNESCO, Artificial Intelligence LLM’s (Large Language Models) can reinforce bias and produce ‘hallucinations’ in order to fill data shortages and gaps. For example, The World Digital Library contains over 19,000 archives, but less than 10% of them reflect cultures outside of Europe and North America, this could perpetuate our lack of understanding of important information such as dead languages and the contexts of ancient cultural artefacts.

Knowing that AI models can recognise patterns and connections based on the data it is already familiar with, key features may be overlooked if they are outside of the area of expertise, as in the data they were trained on, and some cultures are likely to become under-represented or misrepresented. It is crucial that we incorporate diverse data sets from across the world into AI models to ensure that it contributes to a more inclusive and accurate understanding of global history.

The Optimistic Future of AI in Historical Research

The objective should be for AI to be the mitigator of such bias and even identify alternative interpretations using machine learning and training to reduce the influence of societal constraints and promote objectivity. In order for these improvements to take place, we need to be aware of potential biases and inaccuracies existing in the data that is fed to AI models, with transparency and critical evaluation as the next important steps.

The future of accurate historical data moreover involves the present. Developers should strive to diversify datasets, and scholars and researchers should ensure that their studies are as impartial as possible, to conserve accurate information for the generations to come.

References:

Mohamed, S., Png, M.-T., & Isaac, W., Decolonizing Artificial Intelligence (DAIR Institute)

Montón-Subías, S., and Hernando, A., 2018. Modern colonialism, eurocentrism and historical archaeology: some engendered thoughts. European journal of archaeology, 21(3), pp.455-471.

Assael, Y., Sommerschield, T., Shillingford, B. et al. Restoring and attributing ancient texts using deep neural networks. Nature 603, 280–283 (2022).

UNESCO., AI and Archaeology: The State of the Field by UNESCO (2021)

Don't miss out on the latest news!
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

People also read

3D Technologies and AI

3D technologies and spatial AI applications in archaeology

This article explores the transformative impact of 3D technologies on archaeological research and documentation. It outlines three primary sensing tools used in modern archaeology: photogrammetry, Lidar scanning, and 3D cameras. Each method's strengths and applications are discussed, highlighting their roles in creating accurate digital representations of artifacts, sites, and landscapes. The integration of artificial intelligence in processing 3D models is examined, including element classification and the conversion of outdated maps into vector polygons.
noam bar
Noam Bar David
October 22, 2024
7
min read
Generative AI
Archaeology
notre dame assassin's creed rebuild

Preserving history through modern technology

Digital technologies are transforming cultural heritage preservation, making history more accessible and engaging. From virtual reality experiences to AI-powered restorations, innovative tools are breaking down barriers and allowing deeper connections with historical narratives. Discover the projects and technologies leading this digital revolution in heritage preservation.
author
Tatiana But
October 16, 2024
7
min read
History
ai driven maps

The World Needs Gen-AI World Maps: How the Global South Uses Knowledge Tools That the West Takes For Granted

This article explores the potential of conversational AI to revolutionize how we interact with large data sets. Such tools could improve research, learning, and global development by allowing users to create personalized maps and data visualizations.
Michael Mroz
Michael Mroz
October 1, 2024
7
min read
AI Bias
Digital Humanities
Generative AI

Contribute to Historica's blog!

Learn guidelines, requirements, and join our history-loving community.

Become an author

FAQs

How can I contribute to or collaborate with the Historica project?
If you're interested in contributing to or collaborating with Historica, you can use the contact form on the Historica website to express your interest and detail how you would like to be involved. The Historica team will then be able to guide you through the process.
What role does Historica play in the promotion of culture?
Historica acts as a platform for promoting cultural objects and events by local communities. It presents these in great detail, from previously inaccessible perspectives, and in fresh contexts.
How does Historica support educational endeavors?
Historica serves as a powerful tool for research and education. It can be used in school curricula, scientific projects, educational software development, and the organization of educational events.
What benefits does Historica offer to local cultural entities and events?
Historica provides a global platform for local communities and cultural events to display their cultural artifacts and historical events. It offers detailed presentations from unique perspectives and in fresh contexts.
Can you give a brief overview of Historica?
Historica is an initiative that uses artificial intelligence to build a digital map of human history. It combines different data types to portray the progression of civilization from its inception to the present day.
What is the meaning of Historica's principles?
The principles of Historica represent its methodological, organizational, and technological foundations: Methodological principle of interdisciplinarity: This principle involves integrating knowledge from various fields to provide a comprehensive and scientifically grounded view of history. Organizational principle of decentralization: This principle encourages open collaboration from a global community, allowing everyone to contribute to the digital depiction of human history. Technological principle of reliance on AI: This principle focuses on extensively using AI to handle large data sets, reconcile different scientific domains, and continuously enrich the historical model.
Who are the intended users of Historica?
Historica is beneficial to a diverse range of users. In academia, it's valuable for educators, students, and policymakers. Culturally, it aids workers in museums, heritage conservation, tourism, and cultural event organization. For recreational purposes, it serves gamers, history enthusiasts, authors, and participants in historical reenactments.
How does Historica use artificial intelligence?
Historica uses AI to process and manage vast amounts of data from various scientific fields. This technology allows for the constant addition of new facts to the historical model and aids in resolving disagreements and contradictions in interpretation across different scientific fields.
Can anyone participate in the Historica project?
Yes, Historica encourages wide-ranging collaboration. Scholars, researchers, AI specialists, bloggers and all history enthusiasts are all welcome to contribute to the project.